Former ADOR Employee’s Confusion Over Retracted Apology and Role in Situation

B shared on their account on August 17th that Executive A had sent them a lengthy message of 2,000 characters that morning. In the message, Executive A expressed their protest that their apology was being misused and announced that they were now retracting their broad acknowledgment and apology.

B stated, “In regard to my report of workplace harassment, Executive A claimed that ‘This in itself is harassment and too extreme’, which has left me unsure of who is truly responsible for the harassment. As they have also withdrawn their apology, I intend to take the necessary steps to address the situation.”

B also stated that they had noticed a phrase in one of the articles which they did not use and promptly requested a correction. They clarified that any articles based on interviews they were not directly involved in would be corrected within the week. Despite not using the phrase, B still apologized to Executive A for any potential misunderstandings.

Despite ADOR CEO Min Hee-jin’s denial of allegations that she had covered up a workplace and sexual harassment incident, B countered that she had instead defended Executive A’s innocence and insulted B in the process.

After Min Hee-jin issued a rebuttal, clarifying that the case had been concluded without any wrongdoing, it became clear that the issue stemmed from accumulated dissatisfaction. In response, B announced their plan to pursue legal action, simply seeking a correction of the false allegations and a public apology.

The source of the information can be found at Daum.