Monster Hunter Wilds is set to bring back the beloved monster Yian Kut-Ku, delighting fans as it marks the Bird Wyvern’s first appearance since the Nintendo era.
Yian Kut-Ku is a fascinating creature within the Monster Hunter franchise. While it shares similarities with Yian Garuga, it is significantly less aggressive and is renowned for its fiery attacks derived from its flame sack. Its last appearance was in Monster Hunter 4 Ultimate, leaving players who joined the series with Monster Hunter World and Rise unfamiliar with this classic monster.
Fans are eagerly anticipating the return of Yian Kut-Ku, and seasoned veterans have expressed their admiration for the game’s developers. One enthusiastic fan shared their excitement on the Monster Hunter Reddit, stating, “The first non-Rathalos returning monster to be revealed being Yian Kut-Ku is super cool.”
As discussions about the update ensue, another player added, “Hopefully we get Garuga back, I need a turf war between them.”
It was noted by one user that “Yian Garuga was originally a reskin of Yian Kut Ku,” yet it is Yian Garuga that was featured in the newer Monster Hunter titles instead of Yian Kut-Ku.
There’s much more to Yian Kut-Ku than just being a nostalgic monster in Wilds. Players will gain the Attack Up boost from the Yian Kut-Ku armor, a significant advantage in the early game. This aspect thrilled fans, with one player commenting, “Early Game Attack up L, I missed you so much.”
Moreover, the Yian Kut-Ku armor offers Fire Resistance, which becomes essential as players progress beyond small monsters and start facing formidable foes like Rathalos. The armor’s Fire Resistance is crucial in preventing players from getting overwhelmed in battles against fire-based monsters.
The revival of Yian Kut-Ku not only stirs nostalgia but could also instigate a genuine meta shift. The inclusion of this armor will undoubtedly aid new players who might find themselves struggling against challenging adversaries such as Rathalos in the initial stages of the game.
Leave a Reply