Challenges in Yulhee’s Custody Battle: Choi Minhwan’s Allegations of Solicitation as a Potential Key Factor

Discussion on Yulhee’s Custody Battle and Legal Claims

On November 11, the program featuring Attorney Jo Inseop on YTN Radio examined the ongoing custody modification request made by Yulhee, alongside her claims for alimony and property division against her ex-spouse, Choi Minhwan. The discussion, which included insights from Attorney Kim So-yeon, provided a detailed analysis of the legal landscape surrounding these issues.

Background of the Case

Yulhee initiated proceedings following her divorce from Choi Minhwan last year, seeking legal representation to assist with custody and property concerns. Attorney Kim emphasized the necessity of establishing a custody agreement when minors are involved in divorce cases. While not mandatory for mutual consent divorces, alimony and property division are crucial elements to address for the future well-being of all parties involved.

Current Custody Situation

At present, custody of the children rests with Choi Minhwan. Attorney Kim explained, “The Civil Code allows for custody arrangements to be defined at the time of divorce. However, modifications can be made if they are deemed necessary for the child’s welfare.” This flexibility is essential in prioritizing the child’s best interests.

Verbal Agreements and Legal Challenges

Attorney Jo highlighted a critical detail: property division claims must be formally submitted within two years following a divorce. Reports suggest that Yulhee and Minhwan had reached a verbal understanding about custody and financial responsibilities, wherein Minhwan would maintain custody and neither party would pursue alimony or property claims. Should this agreement be substantiated, Yulhee may encounter obstacles in her current legal assertions.

Possibility of Custody Modification

While discussing the potential for custody modification, Attorney Kim expressed that courts are generally hesitant to disrupt a child’s established environment. With Minhwan caring for the children for almost a year, supplemented by his parents living nearby and intervening in childcare as necessary, stability for the children appears to be a priority for the courts.

Minhwan and Yulhee with Children — Minhwan and Yulhee with their children

Implications of Public Scrutiny and Allegations

In light of public interest, Attorney Jo addressed the role of children’s opinions in custody decisions. He noted that Korean courts typically give more weight to children’s views starting around age 13, which means the younger children involved in this case might not have their perspectives heavily regarded currently.

Moreover, Attorney Jo raised concerns regarding the impact of allegations against Minhwan related to a scandal involving solicitation. Attorney Kim indicated that if Minhwan were to face any penalties or convictions, this could significantly influence custody determinations, as courts prioritize the welfare of the children. Nonetheless, it was also noted that making custody decisions solely based on allegations is unlikely, indicating that further developments in this case will require careful monitoring.

Source.