Fairy Tail: 100 Years Quest Episode 4 Review: J.C Staff’s Struggles with the Adaptation

Fans were disappointed with the poor adaptation of Fairy Tail: 100 Years Quest episode 4 and were not satisfied with its execution. However, the manga version of the episode proved to be more intriguing. The involvement of J.C. Staff in the animation production had raised expectations for this installment of the series.

Despite the animation being subpar, it was crucial for the intense battle between Natsu, Wendy, and the Fifth Generation Dragon Slayers to be properly portrayed. In this comprehensive review of the latest episode, we will analyze the standout elements and areas that required improvement.

Fairy Tail: 100 Years Quest episode 4 review: The Good

Despite the limited number of noteworthy moments in the episode, the exchanges between Natsu, Wendy, and Erza were well-received by fans. The voice actors effectively conveyed the illness afflicting the original Dragon Slayers.

Moreover, episode 4 of Fairy Tail: 100 Years Quest also featured the return of Brandish, a familiar character from the original series. As a former member of the formidable Spriggan 12, she was known as a significant danger. Brandish’s strength on the battlefield was unmatched, with only a select few able to rival her magical prowess.

The interaction between her and Lucy Heartfilia was very pleasant. She even assisted Lucy when she asked for help and declared her intention to pursue the Aquarius key, despite seeing Lucy as her competitor.

The main focus of the episode was to uncover Touka’s true identity, which proved to be quite enthralling. The portrayal of a character with two distinct personalities was a particular highlight that fans thoroughly enjoyed in the most recent installment.

Fairy Tail: 100 Years Quest episode 4 review: Analysis of fight scenes

Despite having the chance to impress and give fans a glimpse of what is to come in the next episode, J.C. Staff failed to do so. Instead, the animation studio once again showcased lackluster and unimpressive animation.

During the initial battle between Erza and Kiria, there was a sense of dynamism. However, the lack of variety in camera angles during the fight made it uninteresting to observe.

In episode 4 of Fairy Tail: 100 Years Quest, the battle involving the Dragon Slayers was also disappointing. Natsu Dragneel was eventually able to overcome Madmole’s Dragon Armor, but the depiction of the scorching heat that melted the armor was lacking in quality. The animation appeared to freeze a frame and only animate the flames.

Despite the punch that rendered Skullion Raider unconscious, it failed to convey the full force behind the blow. All in all, J.C. Staff mishandled the fight scene in this instance.

Fairy Tail: 100 Years Quest Episode 4 Review: Erza’s Dragon Slayer Blade Revelation Ruined

By having Wendy cast a spell, Erza was able to obtain a Dragon Slayer blade. This weapon would give her an advantage against a powerful enemy, and it seemed as though the tide was finally shifting in her favor.

Despite being considered one of the highlights of the chapter in the manga, the reveal in the anime was poorly animated and lacked a proper build-up. The reveal was rushed, without any time dedicated to showing the formation of the blade. It would have been beneficial if more time had been spent on this aspect.

The review for episode 4 of Fairy Tail: 100 Years Quest was largely negative, with many aspects in need of improvement. The animation in particular was very subpar, lacking any dynamic camera angles which resulted in a lackluster fight sequence.

The anime adaptation failed to include many important details from the corresponding manga chapters. If J.C. Staff hopes to receive a more positive response from fans of the series, they must make improvements.

Continue to stay updated on the latest anime and manga news throughout 2024.

  • Fairy Tail: 100 Years Quest anime confirms release date and more with the main visual
  • How to watch Fairy Tail in order, fillers to avoid, and more

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *