Inquiry into MBC CEO and Team Amid Workplace Harassment Claims Linked to Meteorologist Oh Yoanna’s Tragic Death

The tragic story surrounding the late MBC meteorologist, Oh Yoanna, who tragically passed away in September of last year, is drawing renewed attention due to serious allegations of workplace harassment. As investigations unfold, both MBC CEO An Hyeong Jun and colleagues of Oh are under scrutiny.

Complaint Filed for Investigation into MBC Officials

On January 31, an individual known as Person A submitted a formal complaint demanding an inquiry into MBC’s upper management, including CEO An Hyeong Jun, various department heads, and associates of Oh Yoanna. The allegations encompass aiding in the destruction of evidence, professional negligence, and violations of stalking laws.

Person A contended that certain colleagues may have breached stalking regulations by persistently engaging in harmful behavior toward Oh after work hours, directly impacting her mental health and contributing to her untimely demise. Furthermore, they highlighted a disturbing group chat among colleagues as a potential factor in undermining her emotional well-being.

The complaint referenced a letter penned by Oh in her final moments, which suggested that ongoing workplace harassment played a significant role in her decision to take her life. Additionally, the absence of an obituary from MBC has raised alarm, inciting suspicions about potential efforts to hide evidence.

Person A also called for a thorough review of the inaction by department heads regarding the harassment claims, urging authorities to investigate any possible criminal liability resulting from this tragic situation.

Workplace Harassment and Its Impact on Oh Yoanna

Oh Yoanna began her career at MBC as a freelance meteorologist in 2021. The severity of the situation became even clearer when details of her letter were made public on January 27, portraying the toxic environment she endured prior to her death.

In her letter, Oh detailed distressing comments made by colleagues, identified as B and C, including remarks that undermined her abilities and criticized her work ethic. They allegedly attempted to prevent her from leaving work, intensifying the harassment she faced.

Legal Actions by Family and MBC’s Official Stance

In a parallel development, Oh’s family has reportedly discovered audio recordings and chat messages evidencing her complaints of harassment to MBC officials prior to her passing. On January 23, they initiated legal proceedings against several colleagues for damages related to workplace harassment at the Seoul Central District Court.

In response, MBC released a statement on January 28, asserting that the late meteorologist had not expressed her grievances to management. The statement further emphasized that MBC would conduct an inquiry should the family formally request it, reflecting concerns about potential political motivations seeking to exploit the situation against the corporation.

Below is an excerpt from the complainant’s detailed statement of intent regarding the filed complaint:

The late Oh Yoanna case involves workplace harassment, stalking, and alleged destruction of evidence, requiring a thorough investigation.

This incident is not merely a workplace dispute but a significant societal concern involving relentless harassment and evident negligence. The absence of an obituary posthumously raises concerns of an organized effort to conceal evidence, making detailed inquiry vital.

The deceased had reportedly alerted four MBC employees about her harassment, yet the company’s internal reporting mechanisms seem inadequate, leading to severe repercussions in her decision-making. A comprehensive review is warranted to determine if MBC violated relevant sections of the Labor Standards Act addressing workplace harassment.

Moreover, the failure to report her death publicly may point to an attempt to suppress the case out of fear it could escalate to criminal implications, particularly under laws concerning evidence destruction.

Additionally, the ongoing harassment implies a systematic approach rather than isolated incidents, necessitating a close examination under the Stalking Crime Punishment Law.

This case should serve as a critical inflection point for addressing workplace harassment and reinforcing the standards for employer accountability and victim support.

Source & Images