Kang Daniel Files Appeal in Defamation Lawsuit Against YouTuber Sojang

Kang Daniel’s Legal Response to Defamation Case Against YouTube Channel ‘Sojang’

On December 11, the ARA agency, in collaboration with its affiliated artist and Law Firm LIU, announced through its official social media channels their decision to appeal the recent civil lawsuit regarding the YouTube channel ‘Sojang’. This move comes on the heels of a ruling made by the Seoul Central District Court that found the channel’s operator liable for defamation.

The court, in its decision on November 27, mandated the defendant to compensate Kang Daniel with 30 million KRW. The ruling acknowledged the dissemination of false and inflammatory videos that severely damaged the reputation of the artist.

In their statement, Kang Daniel’s team expressed concern over the leniency of the court’s ruling. They stated, “Given the serious nature of the defendant’s illegal acts and the prolonged exposure to such harmful content, we believe the penalty imposed is insufficient. Misinformation can proliferate quickly, but rectifying these untruths inflicts significant emotional distress, leaving deep, lasting impressions.”

The team underscored the importance of imposing harsher penalties on those who financially profit from the suffering of others. “We are committed to ensuring that those who perpetuate defamation and falsehoods are held accountable. Victims often encounter immense pressure during legal proceedings, making it vital that the justice system reflects the severe implications of these crimes,” they added.

Reiterating their stance, Kang Daniel’s representatives assured fans and the public, “We will actively pursue legal action against anyone who engages in the spread of false information or defaming our artists.” Their aim is to foster a safer environment for individuals in the public eye, free from baseless and damaging attacks.

As this legal battle unfolds, it highlights a broader conversation about the responsibilities that come with media influence and the necessity for stricter regulations to protect individuals’ reputations in the age of digital content.

Source: Daum

Source & Images