The spotlight has once again shone on the CCTV footage of a suspect involved in the theft of Goo Hara’s safe, captivating online communities in a recent development.
The latest installment of SBS’s investigative program “Unanswered Questions”has caused a stir on social media platforms, leaving many intrigued and speculating.
On the 22nd, “Unanswered Questions”explored the complexities surrounding the safe theft at the home of the late actress and singer Goo Hara.
This is trending. The sketch of the thief who stole the late Goo Hara’s safe on January 2020 has finally been out and a personally close friend, an active kpop artist is exactly matching the features. https://t.co/f0u48qrVoa
— linn (@kimhyojinism) June 24, 2024
The expert stated that:
“I think Goo Hara saw it as a Pandora’s box, as it came from her previous cell phone. A person who is very curious about what is related to him in Pandora’s box, if it is opened.
A person who is afraid of the high possibility of receiving a decisive blow.”
The program uncovered information about the stolen safe, which allegedly had a weight of 31 kilograms but was discovered to be empty by Goo Hara’s brother, Goo Ho In. He stated:
“I already took everything important out of the safe while organizing it. When the thief stole it, he just took an empty one.”
The focal point of the episode was the improved CCTV footage of the perpetrator, carefully repaired to expose more distinct features.
The image, which was first hidden by the light of the night camera, was later improved using a restoration application, resulting in a more defined portrayal of the suspect’s face.
The revelation sparked a wave of sharing and discussion on the internet, with netizens meticulously analyzing every detail for possible clues.
The program featured expert analysis describing the suspect as a man in his late 20s to early 30s, standing at around 170cm tall, and with noticeable facial characteristics such as a prominent jawline and slightly protruding cheekbones.
It is worth mentioning that the suspect had an earring on his left ear, which could play a significant role in narrowing down potential leads.
As the improved image spread on the internet, people began to compare it to popular rapper Zico, resulting in baseless speculation connecting him to the theft.
News Article Source
KOZ, Zico’s label, promptly refuted any involvement, stressing their determination to take legal measures against individuals disseminating false information and baseless rumors.
“We have decided that strong legal action against them is urgent as the spread of malicious rumors and false information, which clearly has no connection to the artist, is becoming more serious than can be tolerated.We collected posts and comments from various online communities and SNS and submitted a complaint to the investigative agency, and in the future, we plan to continuously collect malicious posts and file complaints on a regular basis. Additionally, regarding the recently filed artist “We would like to clearly state that the rumors are also not true, and we will take strong action against them as well.
To protect the rights and interests of artists, we will continue to take strict action against the authors of malicious posts based on evidence collected through fans’ reports and self-monitoring. Even if it takes time, we will hold them accountable until the end.”
The response from the general public towards the improved footage has been varied, with certain individuals voicing worries about privacy while others commending “Unanswered Questions”for bringing unresolved cases to the forefront.
In the meantime, authorities are still conducting investigations into the theft and are encouraging anyone with pertinent information to come forward.
Related Articles:
Breaking News: 22-Year-Old Actress Under Investigation for the Alleged Murder of Her 77-Year-Old Tycoon Husband Just Three Months Post-Wedding
6:50
BTS Jungkook Fails to Mention Rosé in “APT”: Fans Share Mixed Reactions
3:58
Lee Jung-jae Reflects on Emmy Win and Teases Spoilers for “Squid Game 2”
13:43
Leave a Reply