NewJeans’ Future at Risk: Legal Insights on Challenges and Unpredictable Return

On March 23, NewJeans took the stage at ComplexCon in Hong Kong, just days after a court ruling granted ADOR an injunction that prevents the group from entering into independent contracts. ADOR attempted to intervene but reportedly had difficulty meeting with the members prior to the event.

During this performance, NewJeans unveiled their new track “Pit Stop” without referencing either “NewJeans” or “NJZ” and notably refrained from performing their earlier hit songs. They communicated to the audience, stating, “This might be our last performance for a while. We have decided to comply with the court’s ruling and suspend all activities. It wasn’t an easy decision, but it is necessary for us right now.” They reassured fans, declaring, “We have no regrets about our choice. We will definitely return.”

The song “Pit Stop, ” which symbolizes a temporary halt, resonates with their current circumstances. On March 24, NewJeans responded to the injunction by filing an objection, with another trial concerning their contract scheduled for April. Both parties have engaged substantial legal teams to address the complexities of this high-profile case.

Legal Perspectives on NewJeans’ Actions

Legal experts are examining NewJeans’ decision to continue public activities despite the injunction. Although their performance in Hong Kong may have been pre-scheduled, proceeding after the court’s ruling raises potential legal issues. The presence of NJZ-branded merchandise during the event adds another layer of complexity. Furthermore, upon their return to Korea on March 25, the group was spotted wearing NJZ caps, subtly affirming their stance.

Attorney Noh Jong-eon commented on the situation, stating, “NewJeans may have jeopardized their legal standing by continuing with the Hong Kong performance. The injunction was clear that they should not act independently of ADOR, yet they went ahead with the event immediately afterward, which could be construed as intentional defiance.”

Noh emphasized, “Adhering to legal protocols is essential, and ignoring a court ruling could negatively impact their case. Regardless of the various ongoing disputes, the key issue revolves around the legitimacy of their exclusive contract. After their press conference, halting all activities would have been prudent. While I empathize with their worries about their future careers, pursuing new engagements might be perceived as a breach of trust. They were previously seen as victims in the ADOR-HYBE conflict, but this latest action could alter that view.”

Noh also cautioned against the financial risks involved, saying, “NewJeans must be aware that ADOR has not officially cancelled their contract. If ADOR cites the Hong Kong event as grounds for termination and pursues a lawsuit for breach of contract, the members could face substantial financial liabilities. Should this escalate to a full trial, the process could extend up to two years, leaving them unable to resume their activities in the interim.”

Reactions from ADOR and Fans on NewJeans’ Decision

ADOR has conveyed disappointment regarding the group’s recent actions, stating, “We regret that, despite the court’s ruling, the group moved forward with performances under a different name and unilaterally declared a hiatus. We remain dedicated to supporting NewJeans according to the terms of their existing exclusive contract and hope to gather soon with the artists to discuss their future.”

In the meantime, Team Bunnies, the dedicated fandom of NewJeans, has promised fans that they are crafting an official statement. “We are presently in the process of preparing a new statement. Future plans have already been organized, ” they announced.

The outcome of this legal battle is poised to have significant ramifications on the group’s future activities and may ultimately influence how the industry navigates agency-related disputes.

Source&Images