Back in 2019, AMD introduced the Ryzen 5 3600 to the market as a mid-range gaming processor for consumers looking for an option that cost less than $200. When combined with a powerful graphics card, the processor remains a good choice for playing modern games like “Hogwarts Legacy” and “Resident Evil 4 remake,” among others. The fact that the CPU does not act as a bottleneck for high-end graphics cards like the RTX 2080 and the RTX 3070 is one of its strongest selling points.
In addition to that, it is compatible with PCIe Gen 4, has support for high-speed DDR4 memory, and can be readily combined with an affordable B450 motherboard. The Ryzen 5 3600 is an attractive choice as a result of all of these different factors.
Yet, not every gamer should put their money on purchasing an antiquated Processor. In order to assist you in making an educated choice on the Ryzen 5 3600, this article will discuss both the positive and negative aspects of the product.
These days, the AMD Ryzen 5 3600 is only useful for a small subset of gaming enthusiasts.
The Zen 2 architecture serves as the foundation for AMD’s Ryzen 5 3600. The ‘5’ moniker indicates that the chip has six cores and twelve threads, just like any other recent chip produced by Team Red that also has the ‘5’ designation.
Even though it was released about three and a half years ago, it is still featured on popular shopping websites like Newegg and Best Buy for the ridiculously low price of $116. This is despite the fact that it has been around for a couple of generations now.
Specifications
Let’s take a look at the 3600’s specification sheet before continuing with the comparisons and performance so that we can get a better idea of what it is that the chip has to offer.
The processor can only use up to 65 watts of power. Because of this, players won’t have to shell out extra money to keep their chip at an optimal temperature. Even a simple air cooler with one tower that is of enough quality would do. The stock cooling, an AMD Wraith Stealth, that comes packed with the processor should be sufficient for the majority of gamers.
The processor has a basic clock speed of 3.6 gigahertz and can automatically boost itself to 4.2 gigahertz. It is unlocked, and customers can manually overclock it using the Ryzen Master tool that comes along with the product.
| AMD Ryzen 5 3600 | |
| Architecture | AMD Zen 2 |
| Core count | 6 |
| Thread count | 12 |
| Base clock | 3.6 GHz |
| Boost clock | 4.2 GHz |
| Cache (L2+L3) | 35 MB |
| TDP | 65W |
| Price | $116 |
Performance
The most recent Core i3 products that Team Blue has to offer are the Ryzen 5 3600’s most direct competitors. These CPUs are available for an absurdly low price, have a low power consumption, and are compatible with the least expensive H610 motherboards that use the LGA 1700 socket.
Even though it is more expensive, the Ryzen 5 5600 competes with the 3600 in a very close race. Because it uses the same AM4 socket, gamers have the option of purchasing an inexpensive B450 motherboard to use in conjunction with it. Yet, it is advantageous in that it is built on the enhanced Zen 3 architecture, which provides reliable performance across a single core.
| AMD Ryzen 5 3600 | AMD Ryzen 5 5600 | Intel Core i3 12100 | Intel Core i3 13100 | |
| Cinebench R23 single-core | 1250 | 1504 | 1658 | 1751 |
| Cinebench R23 multi-core | 9150 | 11077 | 8443 | 8843 |
| Geekbench 5 single-core | 1183 | 1538 | 1716 | 1524 |
| Geekbench 5 multi-core | 6821 | 8009 | 6739 | 5775 |
According to the results of the benchmarks that were just shown, it is quite clear that the multi-core performance of the Core i3 chips is not even close to that of the six-core Ryzen 5 processors. The Team Blue offerings, on the other hand, were victorious over Ryzen processors in the single-core test.
The vast majority of today’s video games only make use of one or two cores of the computer’s central processing unit (CPU), and gaming is a type of workload that does not take advantage of the high core count that modern processors offer. As a result, the gaming experience provided by Core i3 processors is significantly superior.
In addition, the Core i3 12100F, which lacks an integrated graphics processing unit (iGPU), may now be purchased for as little as $75. So, its value proposition is far higher than that of the Ryzen 5 3600, and for the time being, Intel remains victorious in the low-cost area.
The Ryzen 5 chips, on the other hand, are the greatest choice if you want to save money but still receive multi-core performance for tasks like video editing, game creation, and 3D modeling, amongst others.
Leave a Reply