Revealing NewJeans Manager’s Shocking Comments Leave Netizens Stunned: “That Company is Crazy”

Revealing NewJeans Manager’s Shocking Comments Leave Netizens Stunned: “That Company is Crazy”

Revelations of Managerial Misconduct: NewJeans’ Experience with ADOR

On December 11, 2024, a provocative discussion titled “NewJeans Managers vs ADOR Email Revealed” surfaced on the popular Korean forum “theqoo,” captivating a widespread audience.

This forum topic included a video by Channel A, showcasing an in-depth exposé where the managers of the K-pop sensation NewJeans shared their experiences of alleged mistreatment under the management of ADOR.

Email Highlights From the NewJeans Management

The following are significant points extracted from the troubling email sent by a NewJeans manager:

1. Unlawful Summons and Coercion Tactics

  • Concerns were raised about being called back to the office for an investigation after regular hours.
  • The manager indicated they were pressured to submit their personal computer, even without prior notice.
  • They described the inability to leave the office as coercive confinement.
  • Claims were made that security personnel used fabricated CCTV evidence to coerce compliance.
  • The use of emergency contact privileges to intimidate managers by threatening to inform their parents was criticized as unprofessional.

2. Misrepresentation Following Investigation

  • After enduring the ordeal, the manager believed it was natural to return home, yet the company distorted this as an attempt to “flee.”
  • The manager emphasized the unfounded nature of misconduct allegations that arose during this investigation.

3. Clarification on Advertising Contracts

  • The manager asserted they accurately communicated the members’ intent regarding advertising contracts.
  • Denials were issued regarding claims of proposing direct contracts that excluded the company.
  • They argued that the company had misrepresented their actions as misconduct.

4. Reinforcing Managerial Duties

  • The manager highlighted their primary role of facilitating communication between group members and external entities.
  • This duty is deemed crucial, even amid tensions between the staff and the management.

5. Disputing Allegations of Deceit

  • Claims of dishonesty directed at the manager were firmly rejected due to a lack of supporting evidence.
  • It was pointed out that all communications were transparently shared at the artists’ request.

6. Navigating Japanese Schedules During Chaos

  • Efforts to maintain a smooth operational schedule for both staff and members in Japan were described as critical amidst confusion.
  • Management was critiqued for neglecting onsite staff and failing to offer essential scheduling guidance.
  • The manager claimed they directed external vendors to submit payments back to the company, countering allegations of misconduct.

7. Opposition to Suspension and Resignation

  • The email revealed a strong disagreement regarding the suspension related to alleged misconduct, leading to a resignation submission.

8. Criticism of Company Leadership

  • Management was accused of instructing the manager to selectively communicate only company-approved messages.
  • Leadership was condemned for failing to recognize the anxiety experienced by staff and members during uncertain times.

9. Assurance on Data Submission

  • The manager affirmed that all materials were backed up and returned, with no risk posed to the original data.
  • The PC was formatted to safeguard personal information, with an openness to clarify any concerns remaining.

10. Rejection of Mobile Phone Inspection

  • The request for the inspection of their personal phone was met with strong opposition, deemed an illegal overreach.

11. Denouncement of Public Misrepresentation

  • Shock was expressed over the company disseminating false information to the press.
  • A demand was made for the cessation of misleading emails and coercive communications.

In a concerning development, this manager had previously accused CEO Ju Young Kim of workplace bullying, lodging an official complaint with the Ministry of Employment and Labor.

NewJeans

In retaliation to these serious allegations, ADOR has categorically denied the managers’ claims and indicated their plans to pursue legal avenues.

The exposé left netizens astounded, prompting many to discuss their outrage and even call for petitions against the corporate entity HYBE. Comments reflecting this discontent included, “HYBE must be dismantled,” “This company is entirely dysfunctional,” and “I hope this troubled company faces dire consequences soon.”

Source: theqoo

For additional details, visit Source&Images.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *