![[Review] Exploring Family Dynamics in “When Life Gives You Tangerines” — Are They a Barrier to Individuality?](https://cdn.amkstation.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/final-episode-of-when-life-gives-you-tangerines-1-1-640x375.webp)
Exploring Netflix’s “When Life Gives You Tangerines”: A Love Story with Family Complexities
Set against the stunning backdrop of 1950s Jeju Island, Netflix’s series “When Life Gives You Tangerines” captivates viewers with the heartfelt romance between its protagonists, Ae-soon (portrayed by IU) and Gwan-sik (played by Park Bo-gum).The series has garnered significant acclaim, and following the airing of its final episode, it has left an indelible mark on audiences. An emotional journey culminates as the story reaches its conclusion.
In a cultural critique published by Hankyoreh on March 28, it is suggested that while the drama’s visuals are impressive, it suffers from ideological constraints. According to the article, the portrayal of multiple generations and the emotional experiences of women ultimately fall short of breaking away from conventional family narratives. Female characters are often confined within idealized familial roles, resulting in a lack of historical context.

This critique raises essential questions: Is it entirely justified, or does it overlook the nuanced power of emotional storytelling and the thoughtful creative decisions made by the series’ creators?
Below is the English translation of that article:
Title: “When Life Gives You Tangerines” Romanticizes Family Yet Lacks Feminist Depth
Source of critique: Hankyoreh Culture Feature, March 28, 2025
Currently a topic of heated debate in South Korea, “When Life Gives You Tangerines” draws diverse reactions. Some viewers are enchanted by the picturesque landscapes of Jeju Island, while others are reminded of deep familial bonds, often finding themselves teary-eyed. Comparisons are drawn to other beloved series, noting its resemblance to a female-focused adaptation of “Ode to My Father” or the “Reply” series, evoking the bittersweet atmosphere of director Kim Won-seok’s previous work, “My Mister.”


The Burden of Parental Love
The narrative centers on three women—Gwang-rye (Yeom Hye-ran), Ae-soon (IU, Moon So-ri), and Geum-yeong (IU)—navigating the cycles of life amidst changing seasons. Rooted in themes of love and sacrifice, the drama resonates with viewers, evoking nostalgia for those who have lived through similar experiences, while offering fresh perspectives for younger generations. The emotional core speaks universally: the sacrifices parents make for their children, filial responsibilities, and the sorrow of parting that transcends cultural boundaries.
However, the series stirs unease through its portrayal of generational debt. The burden of expectation is palpably felt, as seen in my own mother’s self-identification as a “200-point mom, ” reflecting the perceived value of firstborn daughters. While love strengthens, it also creates a sense of indebtedness. If my existence hinges on repaying my parents’ sacrifices, can I ever truly be myself?
A Woman’s Identity Intertwined with Maternal Expectations
In essence, the mother’s love is focused on the daughter, yet it simultaneously serves to fulfill the mother’s desires. Gwang-rye lives vicariously through Ae-soon, while Geum-myeong embodies aspirations Ae-soon never realized. The daughter becomes a “gold medal”that signifies the mother’s triumphs—something to be worn proudly.


Geum-myeong, despite her educational achievements and international exposure, remains defined by her relationships—never portrayed as an individual with agency. Even her decisions about marriage are influenced by what her parents might feel, further emphasizing her lack of independence.
Ae-soon’s Dreams Deferred for Family Obligations
Ae-soon’s journey mirrors this struggle. Once an ambitious girl with dreams beyond Jeju Island, her trajectory changes dramatically after an unexpected pregnancy. While the story showcases her accomplishments—such as obtaining her GED and engaging in local politics—these growth moments remain superficial, rarely allowing her to transcend her roles as daughter, wife, or mother.


This narrative focus on family dynamics evokes strong emotions but can also restrict character development.“When Life Gives You Tangerines” between ery romanticizes filial obligations, ultimately stifling personal growth and identity. The drama consistently upholds family values yet neglects to interrogate how these very values may impede individual freedom.
Lack of Engagement with Broader Historical Contexts
Despite its span across decades of Korean history, the series minimally engages with significant socio-political events. The depiction of 1960s Jeju Island is devoid of references to the Jeju 4.3 Uprising and its complex aftermath. One might argue that such omissions are deliberate, considering the sensitivity of the topics. However, even subtle hints could enrich the narrative with historical depth, providing a broader context to the characters’ personal stories.


Geum-myeong’s academic pursuits at Seoul National University coincide with the pivotal June Democratic Uprising, but her personal saga remains distant from these historical events. The show’s focus is inward, failing to connect personal experiences with broader political realities, thus flattening what could have been a complex narrative tapestry.
Progress Symbolized by the Patriarch
Ironically, the narrative arc of growth and “revolution” is bestowed solely upon Gwan-sik, the father. At a time when societal norms dictated rigid roles for men and women, his simple act of turning toward his wife and daughter at the dinner table is depicted as a momentous change:
“The moment Dad turned around, Mom never forgot it. She said a hundred times he must have been the first man in Dodong-ri to do that. He fought his own war. He never left Mom on the battlefield alone. That half-turn, I realized while sipping scorched rice soup, was a revolution.”
This poignant “half-turn revolution” raises critical questions: Why is Gwan-sik, not Ae-soon or Geum-myeong, the one to symbolize transformative change?
A Cautionary Tale of Missed Opportunities
“When Life Gives You Tangerines” had the potential to evolve into a compelling feminist narrative, challenging patriarchal constructs while depicting women’s lives within intricate historical landscapes. Instead, it adheres closely to the safety of romanticized family values.

While it certainly showcases resilient female characters—Ae-soon, Geum-myeong, and the hardworking haenyeo aunties—the narrative ultimately confines them within traditional family structures, whereas male characters symbolize progression.

Despite its emotional resonance and grand thematic ambitions, the series falters in delivering a revolutionary message. It rehashes familiar themes of nostalgia, sacrifice, and generational love without allowing characters to transcend these established boundaries—ultimately resembling a well-decorated monument to familial devotion.
Thus, the drama’s “half-turn revolution” remains unfulfilled, highlighting a poignant irony in its storytelling.
Viewer Responses and Diverse Opinions
Comments on the series reveal a spectrum of reactions:


- Family structures are as diverse as the lives they encompass; there’s no definitive right or wrong.
- Viewers often express confusion about parental perspectives yet recognize the sacrifices made by previous generations. The portrayal of an unidirectional hope encapsulated in parental love keeps the narrative clear and engaging.
- Despite its emotional impact, some critique the series for failing to delve into deeper philosophical debates.
- Different opinions are natural; some viewers were less impressed by the series’ execution.
- If the narrative attempted to depict every individual story, it might have turned into an overly ambitious multi-part series.
What are your thoughts on “When Life Gives You Tangerines”? Share your opinions on the themes and perspectives outlined in this discussion.
Leave a Reply ▼