The Intel Arc A750 and Nvidia RTX 3060 are performance-segment GPUs for 1080p gaming at a reasonable price. The cards are quite similar in many ways, yet there are few changes. For gamers, deciding between the Arc A750 and the RTX 3060 might be difficult. While the RTX 3060 is one of the most popular GPUs on the market right now, the Arc A750 is less expensive.
In this post, we will examine all elements of GPUs, including specifications and performance, to determine which is the best for gaming in 2023.
Both the Intel Arc A750 and the Nvidia RTX 3060 have advantages and disadvantages.
Both graphics cards are quite competent GPUs capable of running the most recent titles at high framerates. These cards are outperforming the flagship cards from previous generations.
Specifications
In terms of specifications, the Intel Arc A750 and the RTX 3060 are strangely similar. Both GPUs have the same number of shading units and RT cores. Nevertheless, Nvidia’s shading unit technology, CUDA, differs significantly from what Intel has produced. As a result, a straight comparison based on the stated specifications is impracticable.
The Nvidia GPU consumes less electricity. It also has additional video memory, which could aid with long-term planning. With the current video games, 8 GB of video memory is already inadequate.
The following table contains full specifications for both video cards:
| Intel Arc A750 | Nvidia RTX 3060 | |
| Shading units | 3,584 | 3.584 |
| RT cores | 28 | 28 |
| Video memory | 8 GB GDDR6 256-bit | 12 GB GDDR6 192-bit |
| Maximum boost clock | 2400 MHz | 1777 MHz |
| TDP | 225W | 170W |
Differences in performance
The performance disparities between graphics cards are usually the decisive factor. In terms of synthetic benchmark performance, the Arc A750 holds a commanding lead.
| Intel Arc A750 | Nvidia RTX 3060 | |
| 3DMark Time Spy | 12578 | 8697 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike (Ultra) | 6968 | 5296 |
Based on the given results, it’s reasonable to say that the Arc A750 is a better card in rasterization workloads. This, however, does not translate directly to video games.
The A750 and 3060 give comparable performance in the most recent AAA games. In titles that rely on rasterization performance, the Arc A750 takes the lead. Yet, in games that use severe ray tracing, the RTX 3060 appears to be the more powerful video card.
| Intel Arc A750 | Nvidia RTX 3060 | |
| Microsoft Flight Simulator | 51 | 57 |
| Forza Horizon 5 | 111 | 101 |
| A Plague Tale Requiem | 51 | 49 |
| God of War | 67 | 71 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 48 | 52 |
| Hitman III | 89 | 100 |
Pricing
It can be tough to select between the 3060 and the A750 depending on their video game performance. But, a brief look at the cost of various GPUs might help to resolve this quandary.
When compared to Intel and AMD options, Nvidia RTX video cards are often more costly. Although the Arc A750 cards start at $229, the 3060 starts at roughly $360. As a result, players will have to pay extra to receive the marginally improved ray tracing performance of the Nvidia card.
As a result, the A750 is a considerably better value for money option than what Nvidia has to offer. If you want to spend more than $350 on a video card, try the significantly faster AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT or the RX 6700 10 GB. In every way, these Team Red GPUs outperform the 3060.
Leave a Reply