The well-known YouTuber Sojang, who is notorious for her harmful videos against famous individuals, had her initial court hearing today with a frenzy of media coverage and public scrutiny.
Sojang’s presence at the Seoul Central District Court marked a significant moment in the ongoing battle against online harassment and misinformation, as they were indicted on charges of slander and defaming Kang Daniel.
Sojang, whose true identity remains unknown, has become notorious for her YouTube channel focused on disseminating defamatory material about prominent individuals in the entertainment world.
Some of the notable figures she has focused on include IVE Wonyoung, the girl group aespa, and solo artist Kang Daniel.
Sojang donned a wig and glasses in an attempt to avoid being recognized during the court trial.
Regardless, her attempts were unsuccessful as Dispatch, a prominent Korean media outlet, promptly identified her.
This is the first time Sojang came for the trial and got caught by the media. She attended the first trial for defamation against Kang Daniel today. May Kang Daniel wins this! pic.twitter.com/X47EKBlDM7
— 𝙎𝙝𝙚𝙧𝙧𝙮𝙉𝙞𝙚𝙡 Ⓓⓐⓝⓘⓣⓨ 💕💕 (@AmizaSherry) May 27, 2024
Despite her efforts to remain anonymous, Dispatch was able to obtain clear photographs of Sojang, marking the first time she has been featured in Korean media.
The situation outside the courthouse rapidly escalated as Dispatch reporters pursued Sojang, taking pictures and capturing videos.
Sojang entering the court (again) after getting sued for spreading rumors about kang dan1el😭 (hybe/bighit should be embarrassed🤢 other labels actually do shit to protect their artists unlike the richest multi label that posts the same copy paste weverse notice twice a year) pic.twitter.com/r63e3TTSis
— Dening (@gol3naotc) May 27, 2024
At the time of writing, these images have become popular on social media platforms such as X (formerly Twitter) and TikTok, accumulating 341.2K and 547K views, respectively.
this is taking me tf out 😭😭 idk what’s funnier, sojang comically running away from dispatch or the camerawoman laughing at her 😭😭😭😭😭pic.twitter.com/7RJRSPmATv
— eni. ᐟ (@aidollze) May 27, 2024
The widespread dissemination of these images has only increased the public’s curiosity about the trial and the individual responsible for the contentious YouTube channel.
Throughout the trial, Sojang’s lawyer admitted to her involvement in creating and sharing the video that slandered Kang Daniel.
On the other hand, the defense contended that Sojang had no intention of defaming the singer.
The lawyer argued that the content was intended to be critical and opinionated rather than malicious. Despite this, Sojang maintained her position and denied any malicious intent behind her videos.
Despite this assertion, there has been doubt regarding the validity of her claims due to the potentially harmful and damaging nature of her content, which is perceived by many as damaging to the reputations of those involved.
-star Jang Wonyoung and starship sued Sojang the slanderer and won. Wonyoung took part and even hired his own lawyer to sue Sojang. really cool 🥹 wonyoung also said he was suing not because of himself but also other kpop idols who had been slandered by sojang pic.twitter.com/fiaiABNdih
— Starfess || Kirim menfess di Tele (@starfess) January 17, 2024
The case has prompted a wider discussion about the effects of online defamation on individuals in the public eye.
Famous personalities like Kang Daniel often face baseless rumors and cruel attacks, which greatly impact their mental well-being and careers.
The decision of Sojang’s trial has the potential to establish a standard for how similar cases are dealt with in the future, potentially resulting in more stringent regulations and consequences for defamatory behavior on the internet.
While waiting for updates about the lawsuit filed by Kang Daniel against Konnect Ent. major shareholder (Mr. A), we also got the news about the first trial on the infamous youtuber, Park Sojang being charged for defamation against Kang Daniel today. May justice prevail. pic.twitter.com/hKFP5GPxbR
— KANG DANIEL Wikipedia (@danielk_wiki) May 27,
The trial serves as a reminder of the significance of responsibility in the era of technology, where the anonymity offered by platforms such as YouTube can often protect individuals from facing the consequences of their behavior.
As the case continues, it is yet to be determined how the court will harmonize the right to freedom of speech with the responsibility to safeguard individuals from false accusations and harmful statements.
Wonyoung won the lawsuit against YouTuber Sojang for the damages she defamation. Wonyoung and other artists suffered psychologically after sojang terrorized them #IVE #아이브 #JANGWONYOUNG #장원영 #WONYOUNG pic.twitter.com/3aX8VDnhKc
— random kpop moments (@kpopinmind) January 17, 2024
The trial has sparked a mix of responses from the public. Some individuals argue that Sojang’s content, although contentious, is protected by the right to express oneself freely.
Some people contend that her behavior qualifies as cyberbullying and defamation, warranting strong repercussions as a deterrent for similar actions in the future.
Sojang was heavily responsible for the hate train against SH he was obsessed w him and constantly made defamation content on SH esp when he was MC with WY. .. I’m so so soooo fkin glad and proud of WY to sue him not only for herself but all other idols who were targeted by Sojang
— zaya (fan account) (@bbyghoon) January 17, 2024
Throughout the duration of the trial, both the media and the public stay focused on the ongoing proceedings.
The case not only sheds light on the negative aspects of internet culture, but also serves as a crucial reminder of the significant influence that words and actions can have on others, even in the seemingly detached world of social media.
Leave a Reply