On October 11, the Seoul Central District Court’s Civil Division 41, presided over by Judge Jung Hoe-il, convened for the second mediation session regarding the High-profile lawsuit filed by ADOR. This lawsuit seeks to confirm the validity of exclusive contracts with the five members of NewJeans. However, after approximately 20 minutes of discussions, both parties could not reach an agreement, leading the court to announce that a final ruling is expected later this month.

This recent session follows an unsuccessful first mediation that took place on September 14. With no resolution achieved thus far, the court will now take definitive steps to assess the validity of the exclusive contracts, the legitimacy of the termination, and whether either party should compensate the other for damages incurred.

newjeans-independent-activity-ban-thumbnail

The forthcoming verdict has significant implications: the court may rule in favor of ADOR, mandating that NewJeans continue under its management, or it could acknowledge the severing of trust and allow for contract termination, potentially with financial reparations.

Unlike the previous mediation, this session was held privately, and notably, the members of NewJeans did not attend in person.

The tensions between ADOR and NewJeans date back to November 2024, when NewJeans communicated their intention to terminate their contracts. They accused the agency of failing to meet its obligations and indicated plans to pursue independent ventures. In response, ADOR launched a lawsuit asserting that the contracts remained valid and acquired a court injunction to prevent the members from partaking in any outside projects.

newjeans-ador-court-ruling-exclusive-contract-thumbnail

Since that time, both parties have been engaged in a protracted legal battle concerning the contracts’ validity and whether ADOR‘s alleged mismanagement warrants termination.

ADOR defends the contracts’ legality, citing a significant financial investment of around 21 billion KRW (approximately $15 million USD) made by its parent company, HYBE, towards NewJeans‘ debut and subsequent career development. The agency emphasizes that it has adhered to the trust-based dynamics that form the backbone of such exclusive agreements.

newjeans min hee jin-thumbnail

On the other hand, NewJeans argues that the removal of former CEO Min Hee-jin and the subsequent integration of ADOR‘s leadership with HYBE executives irrevocably damaged the foundation of trust vital to their working relationship. They claim that nearly two years of ongoing legal conflict have rendered any future collaboration unfeasible.

The verdict due on October 30 will not only resolve whether NewJeans remains under the auspices of ADOR but could also influence the agency’s future policies and serve as a landmark case for artist-agency relations within the K-pop industry.

Sources: nate

Source&Images

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *